chapter: 12 引用文献リスト

Anvari, F., Kievit, R., Lakens, D., Pennington, C. R., Przybylski, A. K., Tiokhin, L., Wiernik, B. M., & Orben, A. (2021). Not all effects are indispensable: Psychological science requires verifiable lines of reasoning for whether an effect matters. http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/g3vtr

APA. (2019). Publication manual of the american psychological association, seventh edition. American Psychological Association.

Baguley, T. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608x377117

Brydges, C. R. (2019). Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology. Innovation in Aging, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz036

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Revised edition.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates.

Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Routledge.

Cummings, P. (2011). Arguments for and Against Standardized Mean Differences (Effect Sizes). Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 165(7), 592. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.97

Delacre, M., Lakens, D., Ley, C., Liu, L., & Leys, C. (2021). Why hedges’g* s based on the non-pooled standard deviation should be reported with welch’s t-test. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tu6mp

Dragicevic, P. (2020). A mean difference is an effect size [PhD thesis]. Inria Saclay Ile de France.

Editors, J. (2005). Letter to the Editor: Abelson’s Paradox And The Michelson-Morley Experiment. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 4(1), 352–352. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1114907520

Everitt, B. S., & Skrondal, A. (2010). The cambridge dictionary of statistics.

Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202

Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069

Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. SAGE Publications.

Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2001). Review of assumptions and problems in the appropriate conceptualization of effect size. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.6.2.135

Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2005). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=4C49CGkNxLAC

Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164588

Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic press.

Huberty, C. J. (2002). A History of Effect Size Indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402062002002

Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Sage Publications, inc. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=kImkui18i94C

Ialongo, C. (2016). Understanding the effect size and its measures. Biochemia Medica, 150–163. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2016.015

Ives, B. (2003). Effect Size Use in Studies of Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194030360060101

Kampenes, V. B., Dybå, T., Hannay, J. E., & Sjøberg, D. I. K. (2007). A systematic review of effect size in software engineering experiments. Information and Software Technology, 49(11-12), 1073–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.015

Kelley, K., & Preacher, K. J. (2012). On effect size. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028086

Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056005002

Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10693-000

Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting Effect Sizes of Education Interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x20912798

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination. The American Statistician, 55(3), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317098149

Lovakov, A., & Agadullina, E. R. (2021). Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2752

McGrath, R. E., & Meyer, G. J. (2006). When effect sizes disagree: The case of r and d. Psychological Methods, 11(4), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.11.4.386

McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1992). A common language effect size statistic. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.361

Nakagawa, S., & Cuthill, I. C. (2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews, 82(4), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00027.x

Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658

Rosenthal, R. (1994). PARAMETRIC MEASURES OF EFFECT SIZE. In The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). Russell Sage Foundation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610441377.20

Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New Effect Size Rules of Thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100

Schäfer, T., & Schwarz, M. A. (2019). The meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: Differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813

Vandekar, S., Tao, R., & Blume, J. (2020). A Robust Effect Size Index. Psychometrika, 85(1), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09698-2

Wilkinson, L. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594

井上俊哉. (2008). ブートストラップ BCa 法による効果量 \(\delta\) の信頼区間. 東京家政大学研究紀要 1 人文社会科学, 48, 1–7. http://id.nii.ac.jp/1653/00009232/

南風原朝和. (2014). 続・心理統計学の基礎: 統合的理解を広げ深める. 有斐閣. https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=h-vFrQEACAAJ

南風原朝和, & 芝祐順. (1987). 相関係数および平均値差の解釈のための確率的な指標. 教育心理学研究, 35(3), 259–265.

山田剛史. (2020). 単一事例データのための統計的方法について─ 効果量を中心に─. 高齢者のケアと行動科学, 25, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.24777/jsbse.25.0_35